Southern Baptist Convention upholds “Sinner's Prayer Heresy” as a biblically sound doctrine.

Southern Baptist Convention upholds “Sinner's Prayer Heresy” as a biblically sound doctrine?

NEXT...Does God Torture People? So... what about Hell?

"Many "Bible believing Christians" believe many unbiblical heresies. The near universality of the belief does not make it biblical"

Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) Controversial Superstitious "Sinner's Prayer" Clip

"I believe we simply need to be as biblical as possible"?

Platt discusses the video clip of his teaching that led to resolution among Southern Baptists to defend the use of a "sinner's prayer."

It was a three-minute video clip that was shared across the evangelical community. In it, Pastor David Platt famously called the "sinner's prayer" "superstitious." A few months later, he still finds himself explaining the heart behind that message. [1]


"I believe we simply need to be as biblical as possible (2 Timothy 2:15). Do I believe it is 'wrong' for someone to pray a 'prayer of salvation'? Certainly not," Platt maintained in a blog post this week.


The 33-year-old pastor, who leads The Church at Brook Hills in Birmingham, Ala., sparked debate earlier this year when he told attendees at the Verge Conference that there is "no such superstitious prayer in the New Testament," referring to the popular "sinner's prayer."


"I'm convinced many people in our churches are just simply missing the life of Christ and a lot of it has to do with what we've sold them as the Gospel, i.e. 'pray this prayer, accept Jesus into your heart, invite Christ into your life,'" he said. "It's modern evangelism built on sinking sand and it runs the risk of disillusioning millions of souls."


While some agreed with him, others couldn't avoid what they saw as the underpinnings of his remarks – Calvinism. Some thought Platt voiced opposition to the "sinner's prayer" because as a Calvinist, he didn't want the hopeless unelect to think they are saved through a simple prayer.


He pushed back in his recent blog post, stating that "nothing could be further from the truth."


"Any cautions I have expressed with a 'sinner's prayer' have absolutely nothing directly to do with the doctrine of election, and I definitively don't believe that certain people 'actually have no chance for life in Christ,'" the Southern Baptist pastor clarified. "Instead, my comments about the 'sinner's prayer' have been deeply motivated by a concern for authentic conversion and regenerate church membership – doctrines which many Calvinists and non-Calvinists, as well as a variety of Christians in between, would rightly value."


Danny Akin, president of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, came to Platt's defense on Thursday. While noting that Platt could have chosen a better word other than "superstitious" in his talk, Akin said he shared his concern about poor gospel presentations and false professions.


But that doesn't mean he's against the "sinner's prayer."


"I want it to be known that I shepherded all of my sons in praying a 'sinner's prayer' as an expression of the work of God in their hearts as they repented of their sin and placed their trust in Christ alone for salvation," Akin stated. "I have also preached more than a dozen graduation messages and in each and every one I have shared the gospel, invited people to receive Christ, and even helped them as they surrender their lives to Christ by leading them in a 'sinner's prayer.'


"Handled carefully and wisely, I gladly invite people to repent of sin, trust in Christ, and surrender their lives to Him. David and I, I am quite certain, are in 100% agreement with one another on the issue."


Platt addressed his controversial statements during the Southern Baptist Convention's Pastors Conference in New Orleans last week.


"In my youth, I know that I am prone not to be careful with my words (particularly when they can become three-minute youtube clips!), so I want to be very careful with my words today," he said in his introduction.


He went to the New Testament book of John to show evidence of devout followers of Jesus who were not born-again.


John 2:23-24 states: "Many trusted in his name ... Jesus, however, would not entrust himself to them."


"Clearly, from the beginning of the gospel of John – this gospel that revolves around the necessity and centrality of belief in Christ – John makes clear to us that there is a kind of belief, a kind of faith, that does not save," Platt explained.


"Is it possible for people to say they believe in Jesus, to say they have accepted Jesus, to say that they have received Jesus, but they are not saved and will not enter the kingdom of heaven? Is that possible? Absolutely, it's possible. It's not just possible; it is probable."


Platt, who has a passion for global missions, expressed concern that there are millions of people who are being deceived to thinking they're saved when they're not because of a prayer they prayed or decision they made years ago.


At the same time, he made it clear that praying a prayer or making a decision aren't in themselves bad. In fact, that's how many believers called out to Christ and became "justified" through faith in Jesus.


But the question, he said, is: "What kind of faith are we calling people to?"


"In a day of rampant easy-believism that creates cultural Christians who do not know Christ, who have never counted the cost of following Christ, we must be biblically clear about saving faith, lest any of us lead people down a very dangerous and potentially damning road of spiritual deception."


True, saving faith, the Alabama pastor explained, requires first understanding man's condition before God – that they are dead in sin.


"We cannot dumb it down," he stressed. "We are morally evil."


To be born-again, one must repent – turn from sin and self – and believe – "trust in Jesus as the Savior who died for us and the Lord who rules over us."


"We tell men and women, boys and girls everywhere: repent and believe in Christ. Whether we say, 'Pray this prayer after me,' is not the issue," Platt highlighted. "The issue is that together we say, 'By the grace of God in the cross of Christ, turn from yourself and trust in Jesus. Come from darkness to light. Come from death to life.'


"Now we can debate all day long how these words are used in what senses, but the testimony of Scripture is absolutely, fundamentally clear: God loves the world, and everyone in the world who trusts in Him will be saved."


And those who are truly saved, he added, will be compelled to boldly preach the Gospel. They don't have to be cajoled to do it.


Amid debate on the "sinner's prayer," Southern Baptists chose to adopt a resolution this month affirming the prayer as "a biblical expression of repentance and faith."


Notably, Platt voted for the resolution.


"It was encouraging to see pastors and leaders together say that we need to be wise in the way we lead people to Christ, but such wisdom doesn't necessarily warrant that everyone must throw out a 'sinner's prayer' altogether," he stated.


Lillian Kwon
Christian Post Reporter

The following is a personal note from Pastor David Platt about the recent discussion surrounding the issue of the “sinner’s prayer” in the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC).This is the first of two scheduled posts. Following Pastor David’s comments expressed below, there is a link where you can download the entire manuscript of his sermon at the most recent SBC Pastors’ Conference in a PDF.

I recently had the privilege of preaching at the Pastor’s Conference of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC). It was a historic few days among Southern Baptists (or Great Commission Baptists, if you’d prefer that title!) as we elected the first African-American president of the Convention, Fred Luter. I was greatly encouraged by the spirit of unity among pastors and leaders at the convention, and I was reminded of the wonderful value of partnership together among churches for the spread of the gospel among the nations.

At the same time, I was a bit grieved by the response from an issue that I apparently helped spark regarding the “sinner’s prayer.” A three-minute video clip from an hour-long message I delivered at the Verge Conference in Austin earlier this year created conversation and eventually led to a resolution among Southern Baptists to defend the use of a “sinner’s prayer” in evangelism. Though I had some concerns with the resolution as it was originally proposed, I was pleased with the resolution that Southern Baptists eventually adopted, and I voted in favor of it. It was encouraging to see pastors and leaders together say that we need to be wise in the way we lead people to Christ, but such wisdom doesn’t necessarily warrant that everyone must throw out a “sinner’s prayer” altogether.

What grieved me about this issue, though, was the way it was reported in a few particularly prominent places that seemed to imply that this issue was dividing Calvinists and non-Calvinists in the SBC, or even me personally from various leaders in the SBC. Some even suggested that as “one of the SBC’s Calvinist stars,” I am “against the sinner’s prayer” because I “don’t want the hopelessly condemned thinking they are saved or joining churches when they actually have no chance for life in Christ.” In addition to how nauseous such a label makes me, words really can’t describe how much a comment like this pierces my heart, for nothing (I hope and pray) could be further from the truth. Any cautions I have expressed with a “sinner’s prayer” have absolutely nothing directly to do with the doctrine of election, and I definitively don’t believe that certain people “actually have no chance for life in Christ.” Instead, my comments about the “sinner’s prayer” have been deeply motivated by a concern for authentic conversion and regenerate church membership—doctrines which many Calvinists and non-Calvinists, as well as a variety of Christians in between, would rightly value.I believe without hesitation or equivocation that God loves all people in the world (John 3:16) and He desires all people’s salvation (2 Peter 3:9). As followers of Jesus saved by His matchless grace (Ephesians 2:1-10), we are compelled to go with urgency to all people to tell them compassionately of God’s love for them (2 Corinthians 4:5) and to call them clearly to repent and believe in Christ (Matthew 4:17; Acts 2:38). As we do this, I believe we simply need to be as biblical as possible (2 Timothy 2:15). Do I believe it is “wrong” for someone to pray a “prayer of salvation”? Certainly not. Calling out to God in prayer with repentant faith is fundamental to being saved (Romans 10:9-10). Yet as I pastor a local church and serve alongside pastors of other local churches, I sense reasonably serious concern about the relatively large number of baptisms in our churches that are “re-baptisms”—often representing people who thought they were saved because they prayed a certain prayer, but they lacked a biblical understanding of salvation and were in reality not saved. This, in addition to a rampant easy believism that marks cultural Christianity in our context (and in other parts of the world), leads me to urge us, as we go to all people among all nations with the good news of God’s love, to be both evangelistically zealous and biblically clear at the same time (Matthew 28:18-20).

In the end, I believe Southern Baptists—and evangelical Christians, for that matter—embrace this together, stand on this together, and preach this together. That’s part of why I preached the sermon below on Monday at the Pastor’s Conference. My hope in preaching this sermon and even in sharing it now is that it will serve to clarify an issue that is extremely important not just for Southern Baptists, but also for followers of Christ from different denominations, in various streams, and with varying perspectives. May God be glorified across the globe through the faithful preaching of His gospel.

Click here to get the PDF of the full manuscript of Pastor David’s sermon at the SBC Pastor’s Conference on June 18, 2012. The sermon is titled, “Spiritual Deception, Biblical Conversion, and Global Missions.

A Resolution on the “Sinner’s Prayer”

to be presented at the SBC in New Orleans, June 2012

Posted on June 15, 2012 by Eric Hankins

By Dr. Eric Hankins, Pastor of the

First Baptist Church in Oxford, Mississippi

WHEREAS, God desires for every person to be saved and has made salvation available for any person who hears the Gospel (John 3:16; Romans 10:14-17; 1 Timothy 2:3-4; 2 Peter 3:9; 1 John 2:2); and

WHEREAS, A free response to the Holy Spirit’s drawing through the Gospel is both possible and necessary in order for anyone to be born again (John 3:1-16; Acts 16:30-31; Romans 10:11-13; 1 Thessalonians 2:13); and

WHEREAS, Prayer is God’s gracious means through which any person can communicate with Him and is everywhere in Scripture commanded and commended for every matter and every person (2 Chronicles 7:14; Matthew 7:7-11; Mark 11:17; Philippians 4:6); and

WHEREAS, Praying to God to express repentance for sins, to acknowledge Christ as Lord, and to ask for forgiveness and salvation is modeled in the Bible (Acts 2:37-38; Romans 10:9-10); and

WHEREAS, While there is no one uniform wording found in Scripture or in the churches for a “Sinner’s Prayer,” the prayer of repentance and faith, acknowledging salvation through Christ alone and expressing complete surrender to His Lordship, is the biblical means by which any person can turn from sin and self, place his faith in Christ, and find forgiveness and eternal life (Luke 18:9-14, 23:39-43); and

WHEREAS, It is biblically appropriate to help a sinner in calling on the Lord for salvation and to speak of Christ’s response to such a prayer as “entering a sinner’s heart and life” (John 14:23; Acts 2:37-40; 16:29-30; Romans 10:11-17; Ephesians 3:17); and

WHEREAS, A “Sinner’s Prayer” is not an incantation that results in salvation merely by its recitation and should never be manipulatively employed or utilized apart from a clear articulation of the Gospel (Matthew 6:7, 15:7-9; 28:18-20); now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the Southern Baptist Convention, meeting in New Orleans, LA, June 19-20, 2012, commend the use of a “Sinner’s Prayer” as a biblically sound and spiritually significant component of the evangelistic task of the church; and be it further

RESOLVED, That we encourage all Christians to enthusiastically and intentionally proclaim the Gospel to sinners everywhere, being prepared to give them the reason for the hope we have in Christ (I Peter 3:15), and being prepared to lead them to confess faith in Christ (Romans 10:9), including praying to receive Him as Savior and Lord (John 1:12).

___________________________________________________________________________

---

Hell, Gilgul Neshamot and Ibbur Neshamot:
What Happens When We Die?By Rabbi Yochanan Levine © 3.4.10 (latest update 01.17.11)

Let's discuss this on my Blog!

B"H
Among the Nicene Christian dogmas few are so deeply held as the belief in the place of torment known as Hell. Throughout the centuries Nicean pastors and evangelists have hammered the ultimate damnation of the "lost" so thoroughly into the consciousness of the world that even questioning the dogma often meets with accusations of heresy! Others reject God out of hand, arguing that such a cruel Being is not worthy of worship!
As Messianic Jews we are commanded by our Rebbe to search the Scriptures and determine what is biblical truth and what is not. So here we go...

The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some people think of slowness; on the contrary, he is patient with you; for it is not his purpose that anyone should be destroyed, but that everyone should turn from his sins. (II Peter 3:9)

The Fear of the Lord...

First we need to realize that God is not our enemy! He is our eternal well-wisher, our loving Father. He is Adonai Rohi: God our Shepherd Who guides us through still pastures even as we pass through the valleys of the shadow of death (Psalm 23). HaShem is with us.
The biblically mandated "fear of HaShem" needs to be properly understood.

Psalms 111:10 the first and foremost point of wisdom is the fear of ADONAI; all those living by it gain good common sense. His praise stands forever.

What is the fear of Adonai? Are we supposed to cower in fear that HaShem might do us some harm, that He might condemn us to eternal torment if we step out of line? God forbid! Adonai is Love (I John 4:16) and shows mercy to all (Numbers 14:18). He remembers that we are fallible beings formed of clay (Job 33:6)!
The Hebrew word translated as fear is yir'ah. This is the feminine infinitive form of ya're and means "moral reverence." In other words we are to stand in awe of the glory of HaShem. Maintaining such adoration of Him we should never even consider disobeying His righteous commandments. Not because we are "afraid" to but because of our love and admiration of His goodness. If a thing is His Will we simply know that it is for our best.
Both literally and figurative we are to pray without ceasing (I Thessalonians 5:17), to glory in HaShem always (Philippians 4:4) and in all areas of our lives to trust in His goodness. This is what is meant.
One who lives in a state of terror and dread of a vengeful tormenting god could never do this! One might obey outwardly out of fear, but one could never love, honor and adore such a frightening deity!
The doctrine of Hell drives people away from God, it does not draw them to Him!
So... what about Hell?
There are a few scriptures that appear, on the surface, to support the existence of this dreadful place of after-life torment. This is true. However we are told to "rightly divide the Word of truth" (II Timothy 2:15) and to prayerfully reason (Isaiah 1:18) to determine the realities being expressed. When we do this we discover that the God of Love and Mercy would not torture people!

Pagan Origins

So where did the teaching of "Hellfire and damnation" come from?
As the Nicene Church was establishing its official doctrines and replacing biblical Messianic Judaism with Catholicism ("Universalism"), it is a well known and easily established fact that they incorporated the teachings of many different religious systems. These early "church fathers" were attempting to establish a new and global political and religious authority in order to control every aspect of human life. Whatever their motives, the Vatican created dogma of eternal torture as a powerful stick to wield against its opponents.
To this end the Catholic Bishops incorporated the Roman Pagan teaching of Hades: A subterranean place of eternal fiery torment and damnation. Never mind that the dogma has no biblical basis, the Magisterium of the Church declared it so. The threat of eternal damnation made their subjects docile and the collection plates rang with tithes, offerings and indulgences as deceived people sought to purchase their salvation.
The imagery of the Nicene Hell is largely taken from the underworld abode of the god Hades and his part time lover Persephone.
Present day Nicene Christians vary on why people go to Hell. Some teach that the "lost" are condemned to Hell because they fail to make the one decision necessary to achieve salvation: they refuse to accept the death, burial and resurrection of Y'shua as taught by the Church. Others teach that if ones good deeds do not outweigh the negatives one goes there. Calvinists believe people have no choice in the matter at all. They say that the God of love and justice created most human being as fodder for Hell and only a few will be allowed to enter "Heaven." Catholicism is more clear: people go to Hell because they fail to accept Catholic Communion and authority. All Nicene Christians are quick to point out that Hell is not something God "does to us," it is something we do to ourselves.
This is known as blaming the victim! There is nothing just nor loving about this doctrine nor about a god that who create billions of beings solely to torture them throughout eternity. This is NOT the God of the Bible!

The Facts

• There is no biblical basis for this teaching.
• God can do anything and He could easily make another option for those who do not accept His gift of salvation.
• No Believers from the Abrahamic traditions living in the first century C.E. conceived of such a post-life torture.
• Many Pagans did believe in such horrors and they were viewed as savages because it.
• Not a single person in the Gospel accounts ever challenge Y'shua as to the origins of this non-Jewish teaching he allegedly taught.
• The doctrine directly challenges the Torah claims that God is Loving and Just (compare Romans 2:24).
• Many "Bible believing Christians" believe many unbiblical heresies. The near universality of the belief does not make it biblical

What the Bible Teaches

Hades
The Greek word hades is in our New Testament text eleven times. In ten of those cases it is translated as "hell" and once as "grave" in the King James Version.
So what is hades?
Here's what Strong's Concordance tells us about this word:

Name: Hades or Pluto, the god of the lower regions Orcus, the nether world, the realm of the dead later use of this word: the grave, death, hell

That doesn't sound very biblical does it? And yet Y'shua was a Jew who came to call his fellow Jews back to the Written Torah and faith in HaShem. Are we supposed to believe he taught them to believe in the Greek myths? God forbid.
Tartaroo
A related Greek term is Tartaroo, used only at II Peter 2:4. Here's what Strong's says about it:

Word Origin: Greek, Verb from Tartaros (the deepest abyss of Hell) the name of the subterranean region, doleful and dark, regarded by the ancient Greeks as the abode of the wicked dead, where they suffer punishment for their evil deeds; to be trust down to Tartarus, to hold captive in Tartarus."

Biblical?
Of course not.
Gehenna
By far the most common word translated as "hell" in the Bible is Gehenna.
What is Gehenna? Verses like Joshua 18:16 tell us:

Then the border went down to the farthest part of the hill located in front of the Ben-Hinnom Valley [i.e. the Valley of the Sons of Hinnom: Gehenna], north of the Refa'im Valley [Valley of the Giants] ...

The valley of Hinnom (Gehenna) was frequently used by Pagan people for their religious rites:

II Chronicles 28:1 Achaz was twenty years old when he began his reign, and he ruled sixteen years in Yerushalayim [Jerusalem]. But he did not do what was right from the perspective of ADONAI, as David his ancestor had done.
2 Rather, he lived in the manner of the kings of Isra'el and made cast metal images for the ba'alim [the Pagan demigods or "masters" such as Hubal-Sin].
3 Moreover, he made offerings in the Ben-Hinnom Valley [i.e. the Valley of Gehenna] and even burned up his own children as sacrifices, in keeping with the horrible practices of the pagans, whom ADONAI had thrown out ahead of the people of Isra'el.

Such abominable acts were so common that they entered the language as figures of speech. This is how Rebbe Y'shua used the phrase. For instance:

KJV: Matthew 5:29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell [i.e. Gehenna].

And again:

KJV: Luke 12:5 But I will forewarn you whom ye shall fear: Fear him, which after he hath killed hath power to cast into hell [i.e. Gehenna]; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.

Some will argue that this doesn't prove Y'shua wasn't speaking literally. Perhaps, but contrast this pointed counsel:

KJV: Luke 17:2 It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.

Who believes Hell is watery? No, Y'shua was the celebrated Master of Parables, as we read:

Matthew 13:34 All these things Yeshua said to the crowds in parables; indeed, he said nothing to them without using a parable.

While he frequently debated with his fellow rabbis, Y'shua focused his teachings on the common people he met. The Rebbe wanted to make his teachings clearly understood and relevant to their daily lives. He knew that the people of Jerusalem routinely carried their trash to the dump, a huge pit kept burning with fire and brimstone. The flames and the stench of the place were at times almost overwhelming. The city people viscerally understood that were a person to be thrown into those flames there would be no hope of survival! The very thought of it made one shutter. For this reason his analogy of Gehenna was well understood. A person cast in there would have no hope of redemption. They understood him perfectly however we are far removed from their experiences.
In the exact same way those who spent their time in little boats on the unpredictable and often violent seas understood well that if a heavy millstone stone were tied about ones neck and one was cast into the sea, there would be absolutely no hope of escape. Hence the Master of Parables used that example with them.
In modern parlance one may say that those who reject God's offer of the B'rit Hadashah (New Covenant) might as well be thrown into a garbage compacter and crushed or given a lethal injection of some toxin! This is what he was conveying with these analogies.

Does God Torture People?

Did/does the God of Israel torture people in the afterlife? The Sadducees were not even convinced the Torah taught an afterlife (Matthew 22:23) and the Pharisees (including Y'shua) had no concept of afterlife torture! The very idea would is completely foreign to Jewish (biblical) religion and thought. The Pharisees believed in the resurrection of the dead without a lot of specifics.
Such horrors were believed by the Pagans however and that's where the Vatican counsels got the idea!
The God of Israel is said to be a Jealous God (Exodus 20:5). He was known to punish His people in various ways during their lives in order to correct them (Deuteronomy 10:18). He also punished the Gentile nations at times, even cutting them off completely. The idea of eternal damnation and torture in the afterlife however was unheard of! HaShem, the God of Israel, is always shown in the Bible to be just and merciful in His rulings. An eternity of torment for even 80 years of uninterrupted sin is neither. Thousands of years of torment, millions of years of unending agony... for failing to properly place ones trust in God? Such a notion opposes everything we know about the God of the Bible who said "Come let us reason together" (Isaiah 1:18). Biblical religion is completely rational. This dogma is not.

What Did Rebbe Y'shua Teach?

So what did our Rebbe teach about the afterlife? We know that his teachings are always harmonious with the Torah (Matthew 5:18), our source of authority and doctrine.

Matthew 22:23 That same day, some Tz'dukim [i.e. Sadducees] came to him. They are the ones who say there is no such thing as resurrection, so they put to him a sh'eilah [doctrinal challenge]:
24 "Rabbi, Moshe said, `If a man dies childless, his brother must marry his widow and have children to preserve the man's family line.'
25 There were seven brothers. The first one married and then died; and since he had no children, he left his widow to his brother.
26 The same thing happened to the second brother, and the third, and finally to all seven.
27 After them all, the woman died.
28 Now in the Resurrection -- of the seven, whose wife will she be? For they all married her."
29 Yeshua answered them, "The reason you go astray is that you are ignorant both of the Tanakh and of the power of God.
30 For in the Resurrection, neither men nor women will marry; rather, they will be like angels in heaven.
31 And as for whether the dead are resurrected, haven't you read what God said to you,
32 `I am the God of Avraham, the God of Yitz'chak and the God of Ya`akov'? He is God not of the dead but of the living!"

Knowledge of the Scriptures is our safeguard from false doctrine always! (II Timothy 3:16)
Our Parush (Pharisee) Rebbe clearly believed in the resurrection. He agreed with the other P'rushim and rejected the Sadducees contention that we only symbolically live on through our children.
So in order to understand what the Master taught let's consider what the Rabbis (Pharisees) believe:

Traditional Judaism firmly believes that death is not the end of human existence. However, because Judaism is primarily focused on life here and now rather than on the afterlife, Judaism does not have much dogma about the afterlife, and leaves a great deal of room for personal opinion. It is possible for an Orthodox Jew to believe that the souls of the righteous dead go to a place similar to the Christian heaven, or that they are reincarnated through many lifetimes, or that they simply wait until the coming of the messiah, when they will be resurrected. (SOURCE)

The evidence shows that first century Jews believed primarily in the resurrection of the dead at the end of the age (in the Olam Haba or world to come). Heaven, as conceived by Nicene Christians, was not accepted nor even conceived of even though some modern Jews have embraced a similar concept today).
Sheol
The other word translated as Hell in English Bibles is found in the Tanakh (or "Old Testament"). This word is sheol.
In the KJV sheol is translated as grave 31 times, as hell 31 times and as pit 3 times. While some modern Jews do believe in a place similar to the Catholic notion of Purgatory -- for a time that never exceeds one year -- the word sheol literally means grave. When a person dies he/she goes to sheol: to the grave. The Sadducees believed life ended there (Mark 12;18). Rebbe Y'shua, our Cohen Gadol (High Priest and Mediator), knew that all souls are resurrected in the Olam Haba.
The Resurrection and/or Reincarnation of the Departed
As the above quote says of today's Orthodox Rabbis, like the Pharisees our Rebbe didn't speak much about the specifics of the afterlife. He was far more focused on encouraging his hearers to make wise decisions during this life. He did shed light on the subject however. Like the other Pharisees Y'shua taught the resurrection of the dead, and like the other Pharisees he doubtless accepted that reincarnation sometimes comes into play. For instance:

John 9:1 As Yeshua passed along, he saw a man blind from birth.
2 His talmidim asked him, "Rabbi, who sinned -- this man or his parents -- to cause him to be born blind?"
3 Yeshua answered, "His blindness is due neither to his sin nor to that of his parents; it happened so that God's power might be seen at work in him.

Note that the Rebbe accepted the possibility presented by his talmidim that the man's blindness could have been the result of own sins (i.e. in his past life). In that case he said that it wasn't it, but it could have been.
And again:

Matthew 17:10 The talmidim asked him, "Then why do the Torah-teachers say that Eliyahu [i.e. Elijah] must come first?"
11 He answered, "On the one hand, Eliyahu is coming and will restore all things;
12 on the other hand, I tell you that Eliyahu has come already, and people did not recognize him but did whatever they pleased to him. In the same way, the Son of Man too is about to suffer at their hands."
13 Then the talmidim understood that he was talking to them about Yochanan the Immerser.

Here the Rebbe states that John the Baptizer was the reincarnation of Prophet Elijah. It is sometimes argued that this only means that Yochanan was "like" Elijah in some way, however this is not what the Rebbe said.
Again, the specifics of the afterlife did not seem to hold much interest for Rebbe Y'shua. His interest is in what we do in the here and now. After our bodies die, Baruch HaShem; God will handle things. We can trust in Him.
Gilgul Neshamot and Ibbur Neshamot
What we might think of as "standard reincarnation" is known in Judaism as gilgul neshamot: the cyclic rolling of souls. The understanding being that the soul "rolls" from one body to the next. Some believe that all souls go through this "rolling" and eventually most come to embrace the Truth while others view this process as an exception that sometimes occurs.
Famed Jewish rabbi and philosopher Saʻadiah ben Yosef (882-942 C.E.) discussed this in his Emunoth ve-Deoth (or Beliefs and Opinions). While defending the traditional Jewish teaching of the resurrection of the dead, he added the fact that some Jews believe in reincarnation as well:

"Yet I must say that I have found certain people, who call themselves Jews, professing the doctrine of metempsychosis, which is designated by them as the theory of the 'transmigration' of souls. What they mean thereby is that the spirit of Reuben is transferred to Simeon and afterwards to Levi and after that to Judah...."

When this teaching is held in mind it gives new insight into verses such as the following:

John 3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his only and unique Son, so that everyone who trusts in him may have eternal life, instead of being utterly destroyed.
17 For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but rather so that through him, the world might be saved.

As Cohen Gadol (High Priest and Mediator between humanity and God) Y'shua desire is that everyone in the world ("kosmos") might be saved. Through the processes of gilgul neshamot that possibility is greatly increased. Again we read:

II Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some people think of slowness; on the contrary, he is patient with you; for it is not his purpose that anyone should be destroyed, but that everyone should turn from his sins.

However not all will be saved as the next verse shows:

II Peter 3:10 However, the Day of the Lord will come "like a thief." On that Day the heavens will disappear with a roar, the elements will melt and disintegrate, and the earth and everything in it will be burned up.

There is coming a day when the chronically unrepentant will be destroyed.
Ibbur Neshamot (the impregnation or incubation of souls) is a more specialized form of reincarnation in which a soul is sent from the spirit realms to impregnate a woman in order to achieve some specific goal or task. This has happened several times according to the rabbis.
Messianic Jews are quick to point out that Rebbe Y'shua is the supreme example of this sort of incarnation. He was specifically sent into the womb of Miryam to fulfill the purposes of HaShem. Ibbur neshamot are always from a positive source.
This term is also used to refer to temporary spirit possession or incubation (again always in a positive light) in which a righteous non-incarnate soul temporarily enters the body of a material being in order to perform some task or accomplish a needed mitzvah (good deed). Sometimes the host is aware of this, sometimes not.
The opposite of this second use is the dybbuk which is an evil and/or demonic possession of a person.

The resurrection

The resurrection of the dead in the Olam Haba and reincarnation (preparing the neshamot or souls for the resurrection) were the common beliefs of most first century Jews (other than the Sadducees who were considered odd for not believing in them). From all evidence this is what our Rebbe believed and taught.

1. Souls reincarnate until they embrace the Truth or time runs out.
2. Liberated souls sleep peacefully awaiting the resurrection.
3. Some souls are called forth for specific tasks from time to time.
4. Many believe that there are eternally Jewish and non-Jewish souls.
5. All Jewish souls were present at Mount Sinai and accepted the Covenant there.
6. Jewish souls do not always incarnate in Jewish bodies.
7. What matters is the here and not, not the after life.

These are fundamental beliefs of traditional Rabbinic Judaism (including authentic Messianic Jews). These beliefs helped to differentiate the Pharisees (from whom Rabbinic Judaism arose) and the Sadducees (from whom the Karaite Jews arose). The Sadducees rejected the concept because it is not explicitly mentioned in the Torah (although it is strongly implied, Ezekiel 37 for instance). The Pharisees found the concept strongly implied in certain Bible verses and taught directly in portions of the Oral Torah. What neither sect believed in was the existence of the Pagan Nicene Hell.
Belief in the resurrection of the dead is one of Rambam's (i.e. Moses Maimonides: Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon) 13 Principles of the Jewish Religion. The second blessing of the Shemoneh Esrei prayer, which is recited three times daily by faithful Jews, contains several references to resurrection.
The resurrection of the dead will occur during the Thousand Year Theocratic Kingdom. This time period is referred to in Hebrew as the Olam Haba or the World to Come. The term is also sometimes used to refer to the spiritual afterlife apart from the Messianic Kingdom. Once Y'shua HaMoshiach initiates his Kingdom of Peace, the righteous dead will be brought back to life and given the opportunity to experience the perfected world of New Eden. This topic is discussed elsewhere on this site in more detail.
The doctrines of gilgul neshamot and ibbur neshamot explain how HaShem is liberating the world through His Moshiach, our Cohen Gadol, Y'shua the Nazarene.




In simple terms, Hell is the absence of God's Holy Presence.
What could be more hellish than that!

SOURCE: [1] http://www.christianpost.com/news/david-platt-still-addressing-controversy-over-sinners-prayer-remarks-77462/ 
SOURCE: [2] http://www.jewtoo.org/hell.html