The American Daddy Blues: An Open Letter To Kirk Cameron

The American Daddy Blues: An Open Letter To Kirk Cameron

BY SERGE BIELANKO

Dear Kirk Cameron,

I am writing this open letter to you today because like a lot of people my age (40) who had simply forgotten that you even exist, you came semi-roaring back to life this weekend.

Dear Kirk Cameron;

I am writing this open letter to you today because like a lot of people my age (40) who had simply forgotten that you even exist, you came semi-roaring back to life this weekend.

Sheesh, it’s been awhile, huh?

I mean, I have seen you on your old sitcom Growing Pains. And then after that thing fizzled out, I remember you crossing my radar here and there in subsequent years too. Usually it was you popping up onEntertainment Tonight or someplace like that, usually spouting off about some God stuff that you had gotten yourself all jazzed up about.

To be honest though man, I never really understood exactly what it was that you were saying.

I mean, I was a grown American man in the evening of my workday, letting my daughter crawl up on my knees, trying not to let her spill my can of beer while she pulled on my beard and I leaned around her to check out the screen.

You know how it is, Kirk: you come home from work and you’re super exhausted and you want to just set back on the couch and slip away.  You want to sit there and let your work pants settle in under your fat butt and feel them smooshing their drywall dust/ joint compound boogers all down into the cheap micro-fiber of the furniture that’s holding your weary bones up.

Or maybe you don’t know that feeling, huh?

So anyway, yeah. I wasn’t really paying attention to you that much.

But still there you were on my TV, standing out in the middle of college campuses handing out Jesus pamphlets or giving some sort of  speech to a handful of people whose faces always seemed smirky, like people who end up running into Kirk Cameron outside some mall in El Segundo or somewhere.

Still, I reserved judgement on you.

I figured well, if this guy has his ear to the so-called heavenly rails then good for him. I mean, he needs something to do, right? Even the saddest lonesome Hollywood tumbleweeds deserve a little wind now and then, I told myself.

Then, the other day, I guess you just decided it was time for you to throw some good old fashion gasoline on the burning skillet. Someone decided you were worth interviewing for whatever reason and the host of the show asked you what you would say to one of your children if he or she came to you and told you that they were gay.

I figured you would tiptoe through those tulips, Kirk. I really did.

But you hardly skipped a breath, dude. Seriously.

“There’s all sorts of issues that we need to wrestle through in our life and just because you feel one way doesn’t mean we should act on everything that we feel,” you said.

Your eyes were sparkling. You seemed strangely excited, like a starving racoon that’s just figured out that it can actually eat itself

I stopped chewing my food there for a second. I stopped chewing my food and I just sat there staring at your face on the screen.

I flipped over to Guy Fieri.

He was talking excitedly to a shank of lamb wearing a garlic medallion.

I felt close to him, to both of them.

It was as if all the world figured out at the same exact time that you might be the worst kind of vampire that ever lived. source:

HOMOSEXUALITY AND HALAKHAH

Traditional sources on homosexuality.

By Rabbi Michael Gold

The following article is reprinted with permission from Does God Belong in the Bedroom? Two claims made by Gold in this article are disputable and should be noted. First, is the assertion that Judaism is not concerned with inner feelings. While it is true that in Judaism actions are more often than not privileged over thoughts and feelings, certain manifestations of Judaism, including hasidism and musar (a 19th century movement that focused on the study of Jewish ethics and values), do stress the importance of inner feelings. Second, is Gold’s assertion that natural law is a concept foreign to Judaism. While some scholars have assumed this to be true, others disagree.

An important point to make from the outset is that Jewish law does not teach that it is forbidden to be a homosexual. On the contrary, Jewish law is concerned not with the source of a person’s erotic urges nor with inner feelings, but with acts. The Torah forbids the homosexual act, known as mishkav zakhar, but has nothing to say about homosexuality as a state of being or a personal inclination. 

In other words, traditionally, a person with a homosexual inclination can be an entirely observant Jew as long as he or she does not act out that inclination.

The Biblical Sources

The basis of the prohibition against homosexual acts derives from two biblical verses in Leviticus: “Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman; it is an abhorrence” (Leviticus 18:22) and “If a man lies with a male as one lies with a woman, the two of them have done an abhorrent thing; they shall be put to death—their bloodguilt is upon them” (Leviticus 20:13). The Torah considers a homosexual act between two men to be an abhorrent thing (to’evah), punishable by death—a strong prohibition.

The Torah gives no reason for this commandment. Some commentators have looked for a rationale in the story of Sodom, in which the men in the town attempt to rape the visitors to Lot’s house. (See Genesis 19; the word “sodomy” comes from this incident.) However, the occurrence in the story was a case of homosex­ual rape, hardly a legitimate precedent for the kind of consensual homosexual acts we are considering. Others see the root of the prohibition in the verse “No Israelite woman shall be a cult prostitute, nor shall any Israelite man be a cult prostitute” (Deuteronomy 23:18). Cultic prostitution, both hetero‑ and homosexual, was a common feature of idolatrous worship in the ancient Near East, but, like the story of Sodom, it is no longer a relevant precedent for modern homosexuality.

Various rabbis have tried to come up with other reasons for the biblical prohibition of mishkav zakhar. (Note, however, that a Torah prohibition always stands on its own even if no cogent rationale can be found for it.) Some rabbis have argued that homosexuality is forbidden because procreation is impossible. Others have defined the homosexual act as intrinsically unnatural and therefore opposed to the purposes of creation. There are difficulties, however, with both explanations. Judaism grants sexuality a purpose above and beyond procreation, and natural law, although influential in the Catholic Church, is not an authentic Jewish concept.

A Talmudic Interpretation

A more likely explanation for the ban against homosexual behavior is given in the Talmud by Bar Kapparah, who makes a play on the word to’evah (“abomination”), claiming that it means to’eh atah ba(“you go astray because of it”). Both Tosefot and the Asheri (medieval commentators) comment on this passage that a man will leave his wife and family to pursue a relationship with another man. In other words, homosexuality undermines and threatens the Jewish ideal of family life, of marriage and children, articulated in the Torah. Heterosexuality is the communal norm for Jews; homosexuality, a perversion of that norm.

The Assumption of Heterosexuality

Rabbinic literature assumes that Jews are not homosexual. For example, the Mishnah presents the following disagreement between Rabbi Judah and the Sages: “R. Judah said: A bachelor should not herd animals, nor should two bachelors share a single blanket. The Sages permit it.” The halakhah follows the Sages because the Talmud says, “Israel is not suspected of homosexuality.”

The Shulhan Arukh (a foundational work of Jewish law from the 16th century) never explicitly mentions the prohibition against homosexual acts but mentions the precaution that a male should not be alone with another male because of lewdness “in our times.” However, Rabbi Joel Sirkes ruled about one hundred years later that such precautions were unnecessary because of the rarity of such acts among Polish Jewry.

A more recent responsum was brought by Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, the first chief rabbi in Palestine. A rumor that a certain shohet (ritual slaughterer) had committed a homosexual act provoked the question of whether he should be disqualified for the position. Rav Kook ruled that the shohet could be retained because, even if the rumor were true, the man might have since repented of his act. It is noteworthy that Rabbi Kook’s responsum considers homosexuality an act of volition for which one can repent.

Lesbianism

Lesbianism is never mentioned in the Torah. One talmudic passage refers to homosexual acts between women: “R. Huna taught, Women who have sex one with the other are forbidden to marry a Kohen(priest).” The halakhah rejects Rav Huna’s opinion and allows a lesbian to marry a Kohen. However, Maimonides ruled that lesbianism is still prohibited and should be punished by flagellation. The prohibition is not as stringent as that against male homosexuality because the Torah does not explicitly prohibit les­bianism, and because lesbianism does not involve the spilling of seed.

A Summary

We can now summarize the classical halakhic position:

Judaism is concerned with explicit acts, not inner feelings.
A homosexual act between two men is explicitly forbidden in the Torah.
A homosexual act between two women is forbidden by the rabbis (i.e. it was not forbidden by the Torah, but was in later times forbidden; this type of prohibition is less severe).
Homosexuality is considered an act of volition for which one can repent.
The reason for the prohibitions seems to be that such behavior undermines the Jewish family ideal of marriage and children as set out in the Torah.
Rabbinic thinkers in the past did not consider homosexuality a Jewish behavior problem. source:

Rabbi Michael Gold is the rabbi at Temple Beth Torah, Tamarac Jewish Center in Tamarac, Florida. He is the author of four books, and his articles have appeared inMoment, Judaism, Jewish Spectator, B'nai Brith International Jewish Monthly, and numerous other publications. He also served as co-chair of the Rabbinical Assembly's committee on human sexuality.

.